[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4307800.p21Sk5E3dV@wuerfel>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:46:20 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Robert Jarzmik <robert.jarzmik@...e.fr>
Cc: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mfd: cottula: add cottula board
On Monday 15 December 2014 00:10:06 Robert Jarzmik wrote:
> +
> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, cot);
> + cot->gpio0 = gpiod_get(&pdev->dev, "lubbock_irq", 0);
> + if (IS_ERR(cot->gpio0)) {
> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't request GPIO : ret = %d\n", ret);
> + return PTR_ERR(cot->gpio0);
> + }
> + cot->irq = gpiod_to_irq(cot->gpio0);
> + if (cot->irq < 0)
> + return cot->irq;
> +
> + cot->irqdomain =
> + irq_domain_add_linear(pdev->dev.of_node, COTTULA_NB_IRQ,
> + &cottula_irq_domain_ops, cot);
> + if (!cot->irqdomain)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> + ret = 0;
> + if (base_irq)
> + ret = irq_create_strict_mappings(cot->irqdomain, base_irq, 0,
> + COTTULA_NB_IRQ);
>
This looks a bit ambiguous: You get a GPIO line for the purpose of the
IRQ nesting but don't use the GPIO otherwise, and you pass the device's
own irq domain start as an IORESOURCE_IRQ resource.
For consistency between DT and ATAGS based uses, and with similar DT
based drivers, I would instead recommend passing the parent irq (from
the GPIO) as an IORESOURCE_IRQ resource instead of a gpio lookup,
and passing the base_irq as platform_data for the ATAGS case.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists