linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.18 15/19] move d_rcu from overlapping d_child to overlapping d

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 11:38:26 -0500
From:	Josh Boyer <jwboyer@...oraproject.org>
To:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:	"Linux-Kernel@...r. Kernel. Org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.18 15/19] move d_rcu from overlapping d_child to
 overlapping d_alias

On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 11:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman
<gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 15, 2014 at 10:46:50AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Sun, Dec 14, 2014 at 12:21:26PM -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>> >3.18-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
>> >
>> >------------------
>> >
>> >From: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>> >
>> >commit 946e51f2bf37f1656916eb75bd0742ba33983c28 upstream.
>> >
>> >Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
>> >Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
>>
>> I noticed you don't have this (and the child commit) queued for 3.17.y.
>
> That is because:
>
>> The backport wasn't exactly straight-forward because of the d_external
>> stuff, but I took a swing at it.  After that, the other commit was a
>> quick cherry-pick.
>
> It wasn't a "simple" backport, and I didn't have the time.  I'm also
> going to drop 3.17 real-soon-now.

Right, figured.  Fedora isn't going to rebase the stable releases to
3.18 until 3.18.2-ish, and this fixes an issue so I thought I'd give
it a try.

>> Al, does the below look correct for a backport on top of 3.17.6?  It
>> builds, but I haven't tested it yet.
>
> Testing would be great to do :)

Working on it.  Just wanted to send it out early in case Al spotted
something obviously wrong and wanted to yell at me for it.

josh
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/