[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <548F0E88.5010504@kernel.dk>
Date: Mon, 15 Dec 2014 09:38:32 -0700
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>
CC: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>, ming.lei@...onical.com,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: blk-mq oops with today's Linus' kernel
On 12/15/2014 09:37 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Mon 15-12-14 16:35:15, Jan Kara wrote:
>> On Mon 15-12-14 08:30:05, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>> On 12/15/2014 08:20 AM, Jens Axboe wrote:
>>>> On 12/15/2014 08:19 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> when running xfstests with today's Linus' kernel I've got the
>>>>> following
>>>>> oops:
>>>>> BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at 0000001000000a28
>>>>> IP: [<ffffffff810ad9f3>] autoremove_wake_function+0x23/0x40
>>>>> PGD 7f566067 PUD 0
>>>>> Oops: 0002 [#1] SMP
>>>>> Modules linked in: ext4 jbd2 crc16 netconsole loop raid6_pq
>>>>> zlib_deflate lzo_compress xor
>>>>> CPU: 4 PID: 0 Comm: swapper/4 Not tainted 3.18.0-xen+ #19
>>>>> Hardware name: Bochs Bochs, BIOS Bochs 01/01/2007
>>>>> task: ffff88007e8fa310 ti: ffff88007e900000 task.ti: ffff88007e900000
>>>>> RIP: 0010:[<ffffffff810ad9f3>] [<ffffffff810ad9f3>]
>>>>> autoremove_wake_function+0x23/0x40
>>>>> RSP: 0018:ffff88007f103d78 EFLAGS: 00010002
>>>>> RAX: 0000000000000000 RBX: ffff88005140f948 RCX: ffff88005140f960
>>>>> RDX: 0000001000000a20 RSI: 0000000000000001 RDI: ffffffff813c2e1f
>>>>> RBP: ffff88007f103d88 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
>>>>> R10: 0000000000000001 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: 0000000000000000
>>>>> R13: 0000000000000001 R14: ffff88007a3bd640 R15: 0000000000000000
>>>>> FS: 00007ff3b5dc8700(0000) GS:ffff88007f100000(0000)
>>>>> knlGS:0000000000000000
>>>>> CS: 0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
>>>>> CR2: 0000001000000a28 CR3: 000000007a580000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
>>>>> Stack:
>>>>> ffff880000000000 ffff88007a3bd628 ffff88007f103dc8 ffffffff810ad8d2
>>>>> 0000000300000000 ffff88007a3bd608 0000000000000000 0000000000000001
>>>>> 0000000000000082 0000000000000003 ffff88007f103e08 ffffffff810adf73
>>>>> Call Trace:
>>>>> <IRQ>
>>>>> [<ffffffff810ad8d2>] __wake_up_common+0x52/0x80
>>>>> [<ffffffff810adf73>] __wake_up+0x43/0x70
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121d94e>] bt_clear_tag+0xae/0xc0
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121d98b>] blk_mq_put_tag+0x2b/0x50
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121ab10>] __blk_mq_free_request+0x40/0xc0
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121abc1>] blk_mq_free_hctx_request+0x31/0x40
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121abff>] blk_mq_free_request+0x2f/0x40
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121b047>] blk_mq_end_request+0x57/0x60
>>>>> [<ffffffff81214f73>] blk_flush_complete_seq+0x293/0x2d0
>>>>> [<ffffffff81215373>] flush_end_io+0x113/0x210
>>>>> [<ffffffff8121b029>] blk_mq_end_request+0x39/0x60
>>>>> [<ffffffff812d3f46>] virtblk_request_done+0x36/0x80
>>>>> [<ffffffff81219d1e>] __blk_mq_complete_request_remote+0xe/0x10
>>>>> [<ffffffff810e1d82>]
>>>>> generic_smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x72/0x120
>>>>> [<ffffffff810657d2>] smp_call_function_single_interrupt+0x22/0x30
>>>>> [<ffffffff813c4462>] call_function_single_interrupt+0x72/0x80
>>>>> <EOI>
>>>>> [<ffffffff8106e606>] ? native_safe_halt+0x6/0x10
>>>>> [<ffffffff810b65bd>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0x10
>>>>> [<ffffffff8104520e>] default_idle+0xe/0x20
>>>>> [<ffffffff8104509a>] arch_cpu_idle+0xa/0x10
>>>>> [<ffffffff810ae64f>] cpu_startup_entry+0x2af/0x310
>>>>> [<ffffffff81066c8d>] start_secondary+0x15d/0x180
>>>>> Code: 64 4a ff ff c9 c3 66 90 55 48 89 e5 53 48 89 fb 48 83
>>>>> ec 08 e8 4f 4a ff ff 85 c0 89 c6 74 1b 48 8b 53 18 48 8b 43 20 48 8d
>>>>> 4b 18
>>>>> <48> 89 42 08 48 89 10 48 89 4b 18 48 89 4b 20 48 83 c4 08 89 f0
>>>>> RIP [<ffffffff810ad9f3>] autoremove_wake_function+0x23/0x40
>>>>> RSP <ffff88007f103d78>
>>>>> CR2: 0000001000000a28
>>>>> ---[ end trace d4dc64619e0b4713 ]---
>>>>
>>>> Is this easily reproducible? If so, could you try and revert
>>>> 52f7eb945f2ba62b324bb9ae16d945326a961dcf and see if that helps?
>>>
>>> Re-checking that patch, it is broken. Reverting that should fix it
>>> up for you, I'll send that in in a bit...
>> I'm running a test with that patch reverted. I'll see whether it fixes
>> the problem in about 20 minutes.
> The revert seems to fix the issue for me.
Thanks for confirming, I was pretty sure this was the problem. I'll get
the revert sent in today.
--
Jens Axboe
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists