lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Mon, 15 Dec 2014 14:54:49 -0600
From:	Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
To:	Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
	Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>,
	Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	<lftan.linux@...il.com>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH (resend)] mailbox: Add Altera mailbox driver

Hi Ley Foon,

On 12/12/2014 08:38 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
> 
> 
> On 12/12/14, 4:04 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>> The Altera mailbox allows for interprocessor communication. It supports
>> only one channel and work as either sender or receiver.

I have a few more comments in addition to those that Dinh provided.

>>
>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
>> ---
>>  .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt |  49 +++
>>  drivers/mailbox/Kconfig                            |   6 +
>>  drivers/mailbox/Makefile                           |   2 +
>>  drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c                   | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>  4 files changed, 461 insertions(+)
>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt
>>  create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..c261979
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt
>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>> +Altera Mailbox Driver
>> +=====================
>> +
>> +Required properties:
>> +- compatible :	"altr,mailbox-1.0".

I am not sure on this convention, sounds like IP version number. Please
check this with a DT maintainer.

>> +- reg : 	physical base address of the mailbox and length of
>> +		memory mapped region.
>> +- #mbox-cells:	Common mailbox binding property to identify the number
>> +		of cells required for the mailbox specifier. Should be 1.
>> +
>> +Optional properties:
>> +- interrupt-parent :	interrupt source phandle.
>> +- interrupts :		interrupt number. The interrupt specifier format
>> +			depends on the interrupt controller parent.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +	mbox_tx: mailbox@...00 {
>> +		compatible = "altr,mailbox-1.0";
>> +		reg = <0x100 0x8>;
>> +		interrupt-parent = < &gic_0 >;
>> +		interrupts = <5>;
>> +		#mbox-cells = <1>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +	mbox_rx: mailbox@...00 {
>> +		compatible = "altr,mailbox-1.0";
>> +		reg = <0x200 0x8>;
>> +		interrupt-parent = < &gic_0 >;
>> +		interrupts = <6>;
>> +		#mbox-cells = <1>;
>> +	};
>> +
>> +Mailbox client
>> +===============
>> +"mboxes" and the optional "mbox-names" (please see
>> +Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/mailbox.txt for details). Each value
>> +of the mboxes property should contain a phandle to the mailbox controller
>> +device node and second argument is the channel index. It must be 0 (hardware
>> +support only one channel).The equivalent "mbox-names" property value can be
>> +used to give a name to the communication channel to be used by the client user.
>> +
>> +Example:
>> +	mclient0: mclient0@...00 {
>> +		compatible = "client-1.0";
>> +		reg = <0x400 0x10>;
>> +		mbox-names = "mbox-tx", "mbox-rx";
>> +		mboxes = <&mbox_tx 0>,
>> +			 <&mbox_rx 0>;
>> +	};
>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
>> index c04fed9..84325f2 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
>> @@ -45,4 +45,10 @@ config PCC
>>  	  states). Select this driver if your platform implements the
>>  	  PCC clients mentioned above.
>>  
>> +config ALTERA_MBOX
>> +	tristate "Altera Mailbox"

You haven't used any depends on here, this driver is not applicable on
all platforms, right?

>> +	help
>> +	  An implementation of the Altera Mailbox soft core. It is used
>> +	  to send message between processors. Say Y here if you want to use the
>> +	  Altera mailbox support.
>>  endif
>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
>> index dd412c2..2e79231 100644
>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Makefile
>> @@ -7,3 +7,5 @@ obj-$(CONFIG_PL320_MBOX)	+= pl320-ipc.o
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_OMAP2PLUS_MBOX)	+= omap-mailbox.o
>>  
>>  obj-$(CONFIG_PCC)		+= pcc.o
>> +
>> +obj-$(CONFIG_ALTERA_MBOX)	+= mailbox-altera.o
>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 0000000..9ed10de
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,404 @@
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright Altera Corporation (C) 2013-2014. All rights reserved
>> + *
>> + * This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it
>> + * under the terms and conditions of the GNU General Public License,
>> + * version 2, as published by the Free Software Foundation.
>> + *
>> + * This program is distributed in the hope it will be useful, but WITHOUT
>> + * ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of MERCHANTABILITY or
>> + * FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the GNU General Public License for
>> + * more details.
>> + *
>> + * You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License along with
>> + * this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/kernel.h>
>> +#include <linux/module.h>
>> +#include <linux/device.h>
>> +#include <linux/platform_device.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/io.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/mailbox_controller.h>
> 
> Alphabetize the headers.
> 
>> +
>> +#define DRIVER_NAME	"altera-mailbox"
>> +
>> +#define MAILBOX_CMD_REG			0x00
>> +#define MAILBOX_PTR_REG			0x04
>> +#define MAILBOX_STS_REG			0x08
>> +#define MAILBOX_INTMASK_REG		0x0C
>> +
>> +#define INT_PENDING_MSK			0x1
>> +#define INT_SPACE_MSK			0x2
>> +
>> +#define STS_PENDING_MSK			0x1
>> +#define STS_FULL_MSK			0x2
>> +#define STS_FULL_OFT			0x1
>> +
>> +#define MBOX_PENDING(status)	(((status) & STS_PENDING_MSK))
>> +#define MBOX_FULL(status)	(((status) & STS_FULL_MSK) >> STS_FULL_OFT)
>> +
>> +enum altera_mbox_msg {
>> +	MBOX_CMD = 0,
>> +	MBOX_PTR,
>> +};
>> +
>> +#define MBOX_POLLING_MS		1	/* polling interval 1ms */
>> +
>> +struct altera_mbox {
>> +	bool is_sender;		/* 1-sender, 0-receiver */
>> +	bool intr_mode;
>> +	int irq;
>> +	void __iomem *mbox_base;
>> +	struct device *dev;
>> +	struct mbox_chan chan;
>> +	struct mbox_controller controller;
>> +
>> +	/* If the controller supports only RX polling mode */
>> +	struct timer_list rxpoll_timer;
>> +};
>> +
>> +static inline struct altera_mbox *to_altera_mbox(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	if (!chan)
>> +		return NULL;
>> +
>> +	return container_of(chan, struct altera_mbox, chan);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int altera_mbox_full(struct altera_mbox *mbox)
>> +{
>> +	u32 status;
>> +
>> +	status = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_STS_REG);

You may want to replace all the __raw_readl/__raw_writel with regular
readl/writel or its equivalent relaxed versions depending on your needs.

>> +	return MBOX_FULL(status);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static inline int altera_mbox_pending(struct altera_mbox *mbox)
>> +{
>> +	u32 status;
>> +
>> +	status = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_STS_REG);
>> +	return MBOX_PENDING(status);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void altera_mbox_rx_intmask(struct altera_mbox *mbox, bool enable)
>> +{
>> +	u32 mask;
>> +
>> +	mask = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_INTMASK_REG);
>> +	if (enable)
>> +		mask |= INT_PENDING_MSK;
>> +	else
>> +		mask &= ~INT_PENDING_MSK;
>> +	__raw_writel(mask, mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_INTMASK_REG);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void altera_mbox_tx_intmask(struct altera_mbox *mbox, bool enable)
>> +{
>> +	u32 mask;
>> +
>> +	mask = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_INTMASK_REG);
>> +	if (enable)
>> +		mask |= INT_SPACE_MSK;
>> +	else
>> +		mask &= ~INT_SPACE_MSK;
>> +	__raw_writel(mask, mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_INTMASK_REG);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool altera_mbox_is_sender(struct altera_mbox *mbox)
>> +{
>> +	u32 reg;
>> +	/* Write a magic number to PTR register and read back this register.
>> +	 * This register is read-write if it is a sender.
>> +	 */
>> +	#define MBOX_MAGIC	0xA5A5AA55
>> +	__raw_writel(MBOX_MAGIC, mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_PTR_REG);
>> +	reg = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_PTR_REG);
>> +	if (reg == MBOX_MAGIC) {
>> +		/* Clear to 0 */
>> +		__raw_writel(0, mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_PTR_REG);
>> +		return true;
>> +	}
>> +	return false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void altera_mbox_rx_data(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +	u32 data[2];
>> +
>> +	if (altera_mbox_pending(mbox)) {
>> +		data[MBOX_PTR] = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_PTR_REG);
>> +		data[MBOX_CMD] = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_CMD_REG);
>> +		mbox_chan_received_data(chan, (void *)data);
>> +	}
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void altera_mbox_poll_rx(unsigned long data)
>> +{
>> +	struct mbox_chan *chan = (struct mbox_chan *)data;
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	altera_mbox_rx_data(chan);
>> +
>> +	mod_timer(&mbox->rxpoll_timer,
>> +		jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MBOX_POLLING_MS));
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t altera_mbox_tx_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
>> +{
>> +	struct mbox_chan *chan = (struct mbox_chan *)p;
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	altera_mbox_tx_intmask(mbox, false);
>> +	mbox_chan_txdone(chan, 0);
>> +
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t altera_mbox_rx_interrupt(int irq, void *p)
>> +{
>> +	struct mbox_chan *chan = (struct mbox_chan *)p;
>> +
>> +	altera_mbox_rx_data(chan);
>> +	return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_startup_sender(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	if (mbox->intr_mode) {
>> +		ret = request_irq(mbox->irq, altera_mbox_tx_interrupt, 0,
> 
> Use devm_request_irq, since you didn't have and don't need use free_irq
> in the shutdown function.
> 
>> +			DRIVER_NAME, chan);
>> +		if (unlikely(ret)) {
>> +			dev_err(mbox->dev,
>> +				"failed to register mailbox interrupt:%d\n",
>> +				ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_startup_receiver(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	int ret;
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	if (mbox->intr_mode) {
>> +		ret = request_irq(mbox->irq, altera_mbox_rx_interrupt, 0,
>> +			DRIVER_NAME, chan);
> 
> Use devm_request_irq
> 
> 
>> +		if (unlikely(ret)) {
>> +			dev_err(mbox->dev,
>> +				"failed to register mailbox interrupt:%d\n",
>> +				ret);
>> +			return ret;
>> +		}
>> +		altera_mbox_rx_intmask(mbox, true);
>> +	} else {
>> +		/* Setup polling timer */
>> +		setup_timer(&mbox->rxpoll_timer, altera_mbox_poll_rx,
>> +			(unsigned long)chan);
>> +		mod_timer(&mbox->rxpoll_timer,
>> +			jiffies + msecs_to_jiffies(MBOX_POLLING_MS));
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +	u32 *udata = (u32 *)data;
>> +
>> +	if (!mbox || !data)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	if (!mbox->is_sender) {
>> +		dev_warn(mbox->dev,
>> +			"failed to send. This is receiver mailbox.\n");
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	if (altera_mbox_full(mbox))
>> +		return -EBUSY;

I think this logic in general will conflict between interrupt and poll
mode. send_data is supposed to return -EBUSY only in polling mode and
not in interrupt mode.

>> +
>> +	/* Enable interrupt before send */
>> +	altera_mbox_tx_intmask(mbox, true);

Is this true and required in Polling mode too?

>> +
>> +	/* Pointer register must write before command register */
>> +	__raw_writel(udata[MBOX_PTR], mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_PTR_REG);
>> +	__raw_writel(udata[MBOX_CMD], mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_CMD_REG);
>> +
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool altera_mbox_last_tx_done(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!mbox))
>> +		return false;
> 
> Are these checks necessary? Shouldn't the driver probe function have
> already failed?
> 
>> +
>> +	/* Return false if mailbox is full */
>> +	return altera_mbox_full(mbox) ? false : true;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static bool altera_mbox_peek_data(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!mbox))
>> +		return false;
>> +
>> +	return altera_mbox_pending(mbox) ? true : false;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_startup(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +	int ret = 0;
>> +
>> +	if (!mbox)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	if (mbox->is_sender)
>> +		ret = altera_mbox_startup_sender(chan);
>> +	else
>> +		ret = altera_mbox_startup_receiver(chan);
>> +
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void altera_mbox_shutdown(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>> +
>> +	if (WARN_ON(!mbox))
>> +		return;
>> +
>> +	if (mbox->intr_mode) {
>> +		/* Unmask all interrupt masks */
>> +		__raw_writel(~0, mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_INTMASK_REG);
>> +		free_irq(mbox->irq, chan);
>> +	} else if (!mbox->is_sender)
>> +		del_timer_sync(&mbox->rxpoll_timer);
> 
> Need braces around the else as well.
> 
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct mbox_chan_ops altera_mbox_ops = {
>> +	.send_data = altera_mbox_send_data,
>> +	.startup = altera_mbox_startup,
>> +	.shutdown = altera_mbox_shutdown,
>> +	.last_tx_done = altera_mbox_last_tx_done,
>> +	.peek_data = altera_mbox_peek_data,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox;
>> +	struct mbox_chan *chans[1];
> 
> It would be cleaner if you use devm_kzalloc to allocate the channel here.

Do you even need the chans variable, don't see it getting used
anywhere. You are directly using the mbox->chan during registration..

> 
>> +	struct resource	*regs;
>> +	int ret;
>> +
>> +	mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct altera_mbox),

Use sizeof(*mbox)

>> +		GFP_KERNEL);

You have a few "Alignment should match open parenthesis" checks
generated with the --strict option on checkpatch. I am not sure if Jassi
is requiring them, but I would recommend that you fix all of them.

>> +	if (!mbox)
>> +		return -ENOMEM;
>> +
>> +	regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>> +	if (!regs)
>> +		return -ENXIO;

You can remove the check for regs, devm_ioremap_resource is capable
of handling the error.

>> +
>> +	mbox->mbox_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs);
>> +	if (IS_ERR(mbox->mbox_base))
>> +		return PTR_ERR(mbox->mbox_base);
>> +
>> +	/* Check is it a sender or receiver? */
>> +	mbox->is_sender = altera_mbox_is_sender(mbox);
>> +
>> +	mbox->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>> +	if (mbox->irq >= 0)
>> +		mbox->intr_mode = true;

This seems to be a poor way of setting up the mode. Is it the same IP
block but different integration on different SoCs? Or on the same SoC,
and you can use it either by interrupt driven or by polling.

>> +
>> +	mbox->dev = &pdev->dev;
>> +
>> +	/* Hardware supports only one channel. */
>> +	chans[0] = &mbox->chan;
>> +	mbox->controller.dev = mbox->dev;
>> +	mbox->controller.num_chans = 1;
>> +	mbox->controller.chans =  &mbox->chan;
>> +	mbox->controller.ops = &altera_mbox_ops;
>> +
>> +	if (mbox->is_sender) {
>> +		if (mbox->intr_mode)
>> +			mbox->controller.txdone_irq = true;
>> +		else {
>> +			mbox->controller.txdone_poll = true;
>> +			mbox->controller.txpoll_period = MBOX_POLLING_MS;
>> +		}
> 
> Need braces around the if as well.
> 
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	ret = mbox_controller_register(&mbox->controller);
>> +	if (ret) {
>> +		dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Register mailbox failed\n");
>> +		goto err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mbox);
>> +	return 0;

Not required, ret should be 0 if mbox_controller_register succeeds.

>> +err:
>> +	return ret;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>> +{
>> +	struct altera_mbox *mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>> +
>> +	if (!mbox)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> +
>> +	mbox_controller_unregister(&mbox->controller);
>> +
>> +	platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);

This is not required.

>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static const struct of_device_id altera_mbox_match[] = {
>> +	{ .compatible = "altr,mailbox-1.0" },
>> +	{ /* Sentinel */ }
>> +};
>> +
>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, altera_mbox_match);
>> +
>> +static struct platform_driver altera_mbox_driver = {
>> +	.probe	= altera_mbox_probe,
>> +	.remove	= altera_mbox_remove,
>> +	.driver	= {
>> +		.name	= DRIVER_NAME,
>> +		.owner	= THIS_MODULE,
>> +		.of_match_table	= altera_mbox_match,

of_match_ptr(altera_mbox_match).

>> +	},
>> +};
>> +
>> +static int altera_mbox_init(void)
>> +{
>> +	return platform_driver_register(&altera_mbox_driver);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void altera_mbox_exit(void)
>> +{
>> +	platform_driver_unregister(&altera_mbox_driver);
>> +}

Use module_platform_driver here as you are using just regular platform
driver register and unregister.

regards
Suman

>> +
>> +module_init(altera_mbox_init);
>> +module_exit(altera_mbox_exit);
>> +
>> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
>> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Altera mailbox specific functions");
>> +MODULE_AUTHOR("Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>");
>> +MODULE_ALIAS("platform:altera-mailbox");
>>
> 
> Dinh
> 

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ