| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:33:34 +0800
From: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
To: Suman Anna <s-anna@...com>
Cc: Dinh Nguyen <dinh.linux@...il.com>,
Jassi Brar <jassisinghbrar@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH (resend)] mailbox: Add Altera mailbox driver
On Tue, Dec 16, 2014 at 4:54 AM, Suman Anna <s-anna@...com> wrote:
> Hi Ley Foon,
>
> On 12/12/2014 08:38 AM, Dinh Nguyen wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 12/12/14, 4:04 AM, Ley Foon Tan wrote:
>>> The Altera mailbox allows for interprocessor communication. It supports
>>> only one channel and work as either sender or receiver.
>
> I have a few more comments in addition to those that Dinh provided.
>
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Ley Foon Tan <lftan@...era.com>
>>> ---
>>> .../devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt | 49 +++
>>> drivers/mailbox/Kconfig | 6 +
>>> drivers/mailbox/Makefile | 2 +
>>> drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c | 404 +++++++++++++++++++++
>>> 4 files changed, 461 insertions(+)
>>> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt
>>> create mode 100644 drivers/mailbox/mailbox-altera.c
>>>
>>> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt
>>> new file mode 100644
>>> index 0000000..c261979
>>> --- /dev/null
>>> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mailbox/altera-mailbox.txt
>>> @@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
>>> +Altera Mailbox Driver
>>> +=====================
>>> +
>>> +Required properties:
>>> +- compatible : "altr,mailbox-1.0".
>
> I am not sure on this convention, sounds like IP version number. Please
> check this with a DT maintainer.
Our other soft IPs compatible strings all have 1.0 version number. Eg:
altr,juart-1.0.
So, we want to keep it as same format.
>>> diff --git a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
>>> index c04fed9..84325f2 100644
>>> --- a/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
>>> +++ b/drivers/mailbox/Kconfig
>>> @@ -45,4 +45,10 @@ config PCC
>>> states). Select this driver if your platform implements the
>>> PCC clients mentioned above.
>>>
>>> +config ALTERA_MBOX
>>> + tristate "Altera Mailbox"
>
> You haven't used any depends on here, this driver is not applicable on
> all platforms, right?
It is a soft IP, so it is not limited to our platform only.
Other soft IP drivers also don't have 'depend on', so I think should be fine.
>>> +
>>> +static inline struct altera_mbox *to_altera_mbox(struct mbox_chan *chan)
>>> +{
>>> + if (!chan)
>>> + return NULL;
>>> +
>>> + return container_of(chan, struct altera_mbox, chan);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static inline int altera_mbox_full(struct altera_mbox *mbox)
>>> +{
>>> + u32 status;
>>> +
>>> + status = __raw_readl(mbox->mbox_base + MAILBOX_STS_REG);
>
> You may want to replace all the __raw_readl/__raw_writel with regular
> readl/writel or its equivalent relaxed versions depending on your needs.
Okay.
>>> +static int altera_mbox_send_data(struct mbox_chan *chan, void *data)
>>> +{
>>> + struct altera_mbox *mbox = to_altera_mbox(chan);
>>> + u32 *udata = (u32 *)data;
>>> +
>>> + if (!mbox || !data)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + if (!mbox->is_sender) {
>>> + dev_warn(mbox->dev,
>>> + "failed to send. This is receiver mailbox.\n");
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + if (altera_mbox_full(mbox))
>>> + return -EBUSY;
>
> I think this logic in general will conflict between interrupt and poll
> mode. send_data is supposed to return -EBUSY only in polling mode and
> not in interrupt mode.
What is the recommended error code for this case? BTW, omap-mailbox.c
also return -EBUSY if mailbox is full.
>>> +
>>> + /* Enable interrupt before send */
>>> + altera_mbox_tx_intmask(mbox, true);
>
> Is this true and required in Polling mode too?
Add checking for interrupt mode here.
>
> Do you even need the chans variable, don't see it getting used
> anywhere. You are directly using the mbox->chan during registration..
Will update this.
>
>>
>>> + struct resource *regs;
>>> + int ret;
>>> +
>>> + mbox = devm_kzalloc(&pdev->dev, sizeof(struct altera_mbox),
>
> Use sizeof(*mbox)
Okay.
>
>>> + GFP_KERNEL);
>
> You have a few "Alignment should match open parenthesis" checks
> generated with the --strict option on checkpatch. I am not sure if Jassi
> is requiring them, but I would recommend that you fix all of them.
Okay, will check these.
>
>>> + if (!mbox)
>>> + return -ENOMEM;
>>> +
>>> + regs = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>> + if (!regs)
>>> + return -ENXIO;
>
> You can remove the check for regs, devm_ioremap_resource is capable
> of handling the error.
Okay.
>>> +
>>> + mbox->mbox_base = devm_ioremap_resource(&pdev->dev, regs);
>>> + if (IS_ERR(mbox->mbox_base))
>>> + return PTR_ERR(mbox->mbox_base);
>>> +
>>> + /* Check is it a sender or receiver? */
>>> + mbox->is_sender = altera_mbox_is_sender(mbox);
>>> +
>>> + mbox->irq = platform_get_irq(pdev, 0);
>>> + if (mbox->irq >= 0)
>>> + mbox->intr_mode = true;
>
> This seems to be a poor way of setting up the mode. Is it the same IP
> block but different integration on different SoCs? Or on the same SoC,
> and you can use it either by interrupt driven or by polling.
Yes, it can use interrupt or polling mode depends on hardware configurations.
It is a soft IP and can be configured with different hardware configurations.
>>> +
>>> + mbox->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> +
>>> + /* Hardware supports only one channel. */
>>> + chans[0] = &mbox->chan;
>>> + mbox->controller.dev = mbox->dev;
>>> + mbox->controller.num_chans = 1;
>>> + mbox->controller.chans = &mbox->chan;
>>> + mbox->controller.ops = &altera_mbox_ops;
>>> +
>>> + if (mbox->is_sender) {
>>> + if (mbox->intr_mode)
>>> + mbox->controller.txdone_irq = true;
>>> + else {
>>> + mbox->controller.txdone_poll = true;
>>> + mbox->controller.txpoll_period = MBOX_POLLING_MS;
>>> + }
>>
>> Need braces around the if as well.
>>
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + ret = mbox_controller_register(&mbox->controller);
>>> + if (ret) {
>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Register mailbox failed\n");
>>> + goto err;
>>> + }
>>> +
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, mbox);
>>> + return 0;
>
> Not required, ret should be 0 if mbox_controller_register succeeds.
Okay.
>
>>> +err:
>>> + return ret;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static int altera_mbox_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>> +{
>>> + struct altera_mbox *mbox = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
>>> +
>>> + if (!mbox)
>>> + return -EINVAL;
>>> +
>>> + mbox_controller_unregister(&mbox->controller);
>>> +
>>> + platform_set_drvdata(pdev, NULL);
>
> This is not required.
Okay.
>
>>> + return 0;
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static const struct of_device_id altera_mbox_match[] = {
>>> + { .compatible = "altr,mailbox-1.0" },
>>> + { /* Sentinel */ }
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, altera_mbox_match);
>>> +
>>> +static struct platform_driver altera_mbox_driver = {
>>> + .probe = altera_mbox_probe,
>>> + .remove = altera_mbox_remove,
>>> + .driver = {
>>> + .name = DRIVER_NAME,
>>> + .owner = THIS_MODULE,
>>> + .of_match_table = altera_mbox_match,
>
> of_match_ptr(altera_mbox_match).
Okay.
>
>>> + },
>>> +};
>>> +
>>> +static int altera_mbox_init(void)
>>> +{
>>> + return platform_driver_register(&altera_mbox_driver);
>>> +}
>>> +
>>> +static void altera_mbox_exit(void)
>>> +{
>>> + platform_driver_unregister(&altera_mbox_driver);
>>> +}
>
> Use module_platform_driver here as you are using just regular platform
> driver register and unregister.
>
Okay.
Thanks for reviewing.
Regards.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists