linux-kernel - [PATCH 3/4] PM / OPP: take RCU lock in dev_pm_opp_get_opp

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 16 Dec 2014 15:09:38 -0800
From:	Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:	Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
	Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
	Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
	Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH 3/4] PM / OPP: take RCU lock in dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count

A lot of callers are missing the fact that dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count
needs to be called under RCU lock. Given that RCU locks can safely be
nested, instead of providing *_locked() API, let's take RCU lock inside
dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count() and leave callers as is.

Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
---
 drivers/base/power/opp.c | 15 ++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
index 413c7fe..ee5eca2 100644
--- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
@@ -216,9 +216,7 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_freq);
  * This function returns the number of available opps if there are any,
  * else returns 0 if none or the corresponding error value.
  *
- * Locking: This function must be called under rcu_read_lock(). This function
- * internally references two RCU protected structures: device_opp and opp which
- * are safe as long as we are under a common RCU locked section.
+ * Locking: This function takes rcu_read_lock().
  */
 int dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev)
 {
@@ -226,13 +224,14 @@ int dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev)
 	struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp;
 	int count = 0;
 
-	opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
+	rcu_read_lock();
 
 	dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev);
 	if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
-		int r = PTR_ERR(dev_opp);
-		dev_err(dev, "%s: device OPP not found (%d)\n", __func__, r);
-		return r;
+		count = PTR_ERR(dev_opp);
+		dev_err(dev, "%s: device OPP not found (%d)\n",
+			__func__, count);
+		goto out_unlock;
 	}
 
 	list_for_each_entry_rcu(temp_opp, &dev_opp->opp_list, node) {
@@ -240,6 +239,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev)
 			count++;
 	}
 
+out_unlock:
+	rcu_read_unlock();
 	return count;
 }
 EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count);
-- 
2.2.0.rc0.207.ga3a616c

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/