[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohponveD5W3=L5rd_vVjs2CTHcH93qS8S3H-Bg-S-DckiViA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 09:40:42 +0530
From: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Thomas Petazzoni <thomas.petazzoni@...e-electrons.com>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Stefan Wahren <stefan.wahren@...e.com>,
Paul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@...driver.com>,
Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>,
"linux-pm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] PM / OPP: add some lockdep annotations
On 17 December 2014 at 04:39, Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org> wrote:
> Certain OPP APIs need to be called under RCU lock; let's add a few
> rcu_lockdep_assert() calls to warn about potential misuse.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@...omium.org>
> ---
> drivers/base/power/opp.c | 16 ++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/power/opp.c b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> index d24dd614a..b78c14d 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/power/opp.c
> @@ -108,6 +108,14 @@ static LIST_HEAD(dev_opp_list);
> /* Lock to allow exclusive modification to the device and opp lists */
> static DEFINE_MUTEX(dev_opp_list_lock);
>
> +#define opp_rcu_lockdep_assert() \
> +do { \
> + rcu_lockdep_assert(rcu_read_lock_held() || \
> + lockdep_is_held(&dev_opp_list_lock), \
> + "Missing rcu_read_lock() or " \
> + "dev_opp_list_lock protection"); \
> +} while (0)
> +
> /**
> * find_device_opp() - find device_opp struct using device pointer
> * @dev: device pointer used to lookup device OPPs
> @@ -218,6 +226,8 @@ int dev_pm_opp_get_opp_count(struct device *dev)
> struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp;
> int count = 0;
>
> + opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +
> dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev);
> if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
> int r = PTR_ERR(dev_opp);
> @@ -267,6 +277,8 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_exact(struct device *dev,
> struct device_opp *dev_opp;
> struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>
> + opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +
> dev_opp = find_device_opp(dev);
> if (IS_ERR(dev_opp)) {
> int r = PTR_ERR(dev_opp);
> @@ -313,6 +325,8 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_ceil(struct device *dev,
> struct device_opp *dev_opp;
> struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>
> + opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +
> if (!dev || !freq) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid argument freq=%p\n", __func__, freq);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> @@ -361,6 +375,8 @@ struct dev_pm_opp *dev_pm_opp_find_freq_floor(struct device *dev,
> struct device_opp *dev_opp;
> struct dev_pm_opp *temp_opp, *opp = ERR_PTR(-ERANGE);
>
> + opp_rcu_lockdep_assert();
> +
> if (!dev || !freq) {
> dev_err(dev, "%s: Invalid argument freq=%p\n", __func__, freq);
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
Acked-by: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists