[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141217173915.GF30307@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2014 17:39:16 +0000
From: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
To: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation
On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
>
> We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback
> of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved
> bits(RESx)) untouched. However, sometimes the boot monitor could
> leave garbage values in the RESx bits which could have different
> implications. This patch makes sure that all the bits, including
> the RESx bits, are set to the proper state, except for the
> 'endianness' control bits, EE(25) & E0E(24)- which are set early
> in the el2_setup.
>
> Updated the state of the Bit[6] in the comment to RES0 in the
> comment.
>
> Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> ---
Looks good to me:
Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Is this 3.19 material, or simply a cleanup/being cautious?
Will
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists