lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141223105505.GA21816@e104818-lin.cambridge.arm.com>
Date:	Tue, 23 Dec 2014 10:55:06 +0000
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Cc:	Suzuki Poulose <Suzuki.Poulose@....com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Lorenzo Pieralisi <Lorenzo.Pieralisi@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: Fix SCTLR_EL1 initialisation

On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 05:39:16PM +0000, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2014 at 03:50:21PM +0000, Suzuki K. Poulose wrote:
> > From: "Suzuki K. Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> > 
> > We initialise the SCTLR_EL1 value by read-modify-writeback
> > of the desired bits, leaving the other bits (including reserved
> > bits(RESx)) untouched. However, sometimes the boot monitor could
> > leave garbage values in the RESx bits which could have different
> > implications. This patch makes sure that all the bits, including
> > the RESx bits, are set to the proper state, except for the
> > 'endianness' control bits, EE(25) & E0E(24)- which are set early
> > in the el2_setup.
> > 
> > Updated the state of the Bit[6] in the comment to RES0 in the
> > comment.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Suzuki K. Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>
> > Cc: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
> > ---
> 
> Looks good to me:
> 
>   Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
> 
> Is this 3.19 material, or simply a cleanup/being cautious?

I'll leave this for the 3.20 merging window.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ