[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141218101906.55b7772d@notabene.brown>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 10:19:06 +1100
From: NeilBrown <neilb@...e.de>
To: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
Cc: linux-raid@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drivers:md: Remove no longer needed fixme comment in
raid5.c
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014 10:49:33 -0500 Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
wrote:
> Removes the no longer needed fix me comment related to not needing the agrument faster for the function,
> sync_request. Due to getting warnings when building without the agrument it seems that this fix me was
> wrong and we must keep this agrument in order to avoid build warnings when building without it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Nicholas Krause <xerofoify@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/md/raid5.c | 1 -
> 1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/md/raid5.c b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> index c1b0d52..c0fde2a 100644
> --- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
> +++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
> @@ -4986,7 +4986,6 @@ ret:
> return reshape_sectors;
> }
>
> -/* FIXME go_faster isn't used */
> static inline sector_t sync_request(struct mddev *mddev, sector_t sector_nr, int *skipped, int go_faster)
> {
> struct r5conf *conf = mddev->private;
Why do you think the comment is no longer needed. Is "go_faster" being used
now? Is there a clear explanation somewhere of why "go_faster" should not be
used?
NeilBrown
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists