[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.11.1412180850290.2593@gentwo.org>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 08:52:40 -0600 (CST)
From: Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...el.com>
cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...e.hu>,
Glenn Williamson <glenn.p.williamson@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] X86-32: Allocate 256 bytes for pgd in PAE paging
On Wed, 17 Dec 2014, Dave Hansen wrote:
> IOW, do *ALL* of the sl*b allocators in all of their forms with all of
> their debugging options guarantee 32-byte alignment when allocating
> 256-byte objects?
No. For that the arch has to set a macro call ARCH_KMALLOC_MINALIGN or
ARCH_DMA_MINALIGN. Default alignment is to a word boundary.
> I know we at least try to align to a cacheline, which would be good
> enough, but I'm fuzzy on what we *guarantee*.
Sorry we only do this if requested for a slab cache.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists