[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <549312BB.40400@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Dec 2014 12:45:31 -0500
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: Christopher Li <sparse@...isli.org>
CC: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: How to fix CHECK warning: testing a 'safe expression' ?
On 12/17/2014 09:39 PM, Christopher Li wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 18, 2014 at 6:37 AM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@...com> wrote:
>> if (!ks_pcie) {
>> dev_err(dev, "no memory for keystone pcie\n");
>> return -ENOMEM;
>> }
>> pp =&ks_pcie->pp;
>>
>> /* initialize SerDes Phy if present */
>> phy = devm_phy_get(dev, "pcie-phy");
>> ===> if (!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(phy)) {
>> ret = phy_init(phy);
>> if (ret< 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>
> Hi,
>
> Do you have a smaller stand alone test case which I can reproduce with sparse?
>
> Thanks
>
> Chris
Thanks Chris for responding.
You could add this piece of code for testing
struct foo {
int x;
int y;
};
static struct foo *func1(struct device *dev)
{
struct foo *fp;
fp = devm_kzalloc(dev, sizeof(*fp), GFP_KERNEL);
if (fp == NULL)
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
return fp;
}
And in one of your module in kernel add
struct foo *fp;
if (IS_ERR_OR_NULL(fp))
return -ENOMEM;
and do
make C=2 CF="-D__CHECK_ENDIAN__" CHECK=sparse
You will see the CHECK warning against your module as
include/linux/err.h:40:16: warning: testing a 'safe expression'
Hope this helps.
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists