linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] scsi: arm: cumana

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1419096953.2184.3.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:	Sat, 20 Dec 2014 09:35:53 -0800
From:	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:	Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Cc:	Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com>,
	Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>,
	Finn Thain <fthain@...egraphics.com.au>,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@...il.com>,
	linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: arm: cumana_1.c:  Remove unused function

On Sat, 2014-12-20 at 16:58 +0000, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 08:50:45AM -0800, Jeremiah Mahler wrote:
> > On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 05:36:15PM +0100, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> > > Remove the function cumanascsi_setup() that is not used anywhere.
> > > 
> > > This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
> >
> > You can blame Linus for this one :-)
> > 
> > ~/linux-next$ git blame -L 38,40 drivers/scsi/arm/cumana_1.c 
> > ^1da177e (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 38) void
> > cumanascsi_setup(char *str, int *ints)
> > ^1da177e (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 39) {
> > ^1da177e (Linus Torvalds 2005-04-16 15:20:36 -0700 40) }
> > ~/linux-next$
> 
> Great, that gets me off the hook :)

Well, no, it doesn't: 1da177e is the git tree root commit which was
created by importing the existing bitkeeper version 2.6.12-rc2 into git.
It means this code predates the git import.  You might be able to chase
it through the history tree if you want, but that only goes back as far
as bitkeeper history.

James


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/