[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+55aFzn2K-QJ00_ug6+3z4tdGQr_y3izRTxDpCA0qeW9cvsdA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 21 Dec 2014 16:52:28 -0800
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, Chris Mason <clm@...com>,
Mike Galbraith <umgwanakikbuti@...il.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Dâniel Fraga <fragabr@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Suresh Siddha <sbsiddha@...il.com>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Anvin <hpa@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: frequent lockups in 3.18rc4
On Sun, Dec 21, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> The second time (or third, or fourth - it might not take immediately)
> you get a lockup or similar. Bad things happen.
I've only tested it twice now, but the first time I got a weird
lockup-like thing (things *kind* of worked, but I could imagine that
one CPU was stuck with a lock held, because things eventually ground
to a screeching halt.
The second time I got
INFO: rcu_sched self-detected stall on CPU { 5} (t=84533 jiffies
g=11971 c=11970 q=17)
and then
INFO: rcu_sched detected stalls on CPUs/tasks: { 1 2 3 4 5 6 7}
(detected by 0, t=291309 jiffies, g=12031, c=12030, q=57)
with backtraces that made no sense (because obviously no actual stall
had taken place), and were the CPU's mostly being idle.
I could easily see it resulting in your softlockup scenario too.
Linus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists