[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54985F05.2040603@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 13:12:21 -0500
From: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
To: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
CC: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"davej @mail.xmission.com>> Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: fs: proc: gpf in find_entry
On 12/22/2014 12:52 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
> 2014-12-22 18:51 GMT+03:00 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>:
>> These two instructions:
>>>> 11: 4d 85 ff test %r15,%r15
>>>> 14: 0f 84 de 01 00 00 je 0x1f8
>>
>> Should prevent a NULL %r15 value from ever reaching the trapping
>> instruction.
>
> If they were executed, then yes. But I think there was jump from somewhere
> to the instructions below those two.
There is indeed a jump direct to that point, which avoids the %r15 check.
>> What other horrible things does KASAN do to the machine code?
>>
>
> kasan insert something like following before any memory access:
>
> s8 *shadow_addr = (add >> 3) + shadow_offset;
>
> if (unlikely(*shadow_addr))
> if (unlikely(addr & 7 >= *shadow_addr))
> report_bug(addr);
>
>
> I suspect that Sasha is using kasan along with ubsan.
> In that case generated code much more horrid.
It's not *that* bad :)
Thanks,
Sasha
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists