[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87sig7beqt.fsf@x220.int.ebiederm.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Dec 2014 14:39:54 -0600
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com>
Cc: Andrey Ryabinin <ryabinin.a.a@...il.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
"davej \@mail.xmission.com\>\> Dave Jones" <davej@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: fs: proc: gpf in find_entry
Sasha Levin <sasha.levin@...cle.com> writes:
> On 12/22/2014 12:52 PM, Andrey Ryabinin wrote:
>> 2014-12-22 18:51 GMT+03:00 Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>:
>>> These two instructions:
>>>>> 11: 4d 85 ff test %r15,%r15
>>>>> 14: 0f 84 de 01 00 00 je 0x1f8
>>>
>>> Should prevent a NULL %r15 value from ever reaching the trapping
>>> instruction.
>>
>> If they were executed, then yes. But I think there was jump from somewhere
>> to the instructions below those two.
>
> There is indeed a jump direct to that point, which avoids the %r15
> check.
Where do you see that direct jump, that certainly has not been posted
in this thread?
There are certainly no such code paths I in the source code. There is
only one NULL pointer check in find_entry and it is executed every time
the loop executes.
So at this point all I know is some set of tools has totally destroyed
the code and made what Sasha Levin's is testing so far from the source
code that this is a useless bug report.
I have no reason to even suspect this bug is actually in the upstream
kernel.
This appears to be a kind of testing that slows development and wastes
peoples time. Can someone give me a patch that sets the TAINTED flag
when KASAN is loaded?
Eric
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists