[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20141223093710.GA29096@infradead.org>
Date: Tue, 23 Dec 2014 01:37:10 -0800
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Jan Kara <jack@...e.cz>, Omar Sandoval <osandov@...ndov.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...marydata.com>,
David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/8] swap: lock i_mutex for swap_writepage direct_IO
On Sat, Dec 20, 2014 at 06:51:33AM +0000, Al Viro wrote:
> > The problem is that the use of ->direct_IO by the swap code is a gross
> > layering violation. ->direct_IO is a callback for the filesystem, and
> > the swap code need to call ->read_iter instead of ->readpage and
> > ->write_tier instead of ->direct_IO, and leave the locking to the
> > filesystem.
>
> The thing is, ->read_iter() and ->write_iter() might decide to fall back to
> buffered IO path. XFS is unusual in that respect - there O_DIRECT ends up
> with short write in such case. Other filesystems, OTOH...
We'll just need a ->swap_activate method that makes sure we really do
direct I/O. For all filesystems currently suporting swap just checking
that all blocks are allocated (as the ->bmap path already does) should
be enough.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists