[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <549AD44A.8010603@ti.com>
Date: Wed, 24 Dec 2014 08:57:14 -0600
From: Nishanth Menon <nm@...com>
To: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>,
Eduardo Valentin <edubezval@...il.com>,
Zhang Rui <rui.zhang@...el.com>, Tero Kristo <t-kristo@...com>
CC: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-omap <linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] thermal: ti-soc-thermal: ti-bandgap.c: Remove unused
function
On 12/21/2014 11:43 AM, Rickard Strandqvist wrote:
> Remove the function ti_bandgap_write_thot() that is not used anywhere.
>
> This was partially found by using a static code analysis program called cppcheck.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rickard Strandqvist <rickard_strandqvist@...ctrumdigital.se>
> ---
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c | 13 -------------
> drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 14 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> index 634b6ce..cbb6a5f 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.c
> @@ -611,19 +611,6 @@ int ti_bandgap_read_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *thot)
> }
>
> /**
> - * ti_bandgap_write_thot() - sets sensor current thot
> - * @bgp: pointer to bandgap instance
> - * @id: sensor id
> - * @val: desired thot value
> - *
> - * Return: 0 on success or the proper error code
> - */
> -int ti_bandgap_write_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val)
> -{
> - return _ti_bandgap_write_threshold(bgp, id, val, true);
> -}
> -
> -/**
> * ti_bandgap_read_tcold() - reads sensor current tcold
> * @bgp: pointer to bandgap instance
> * @id: sensor id
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h
> index b3adf72..976afc0 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/ti-soc-thermal/ti-bandgap.h
> @@ -371,7 +371,6 @@ struct ti_bandgap_data {
> };
>
> int ti_bandgap_read_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *thot);
> -int ti_bandgap_write_thot(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val);
> int ti_bandgap_read_tcold(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int *tcold);
> int ti_bandgap_write_tcold(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id, int val);
> int ti_bandgap_read_update_interval(struct ti_bandgap *bgp, int id,
>
Not sure if removing support for programming of hot threshold is a
good idea. how about ti_bandgap_write_tcold then?
--
Regards,
Nishanth Menon
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists