[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAM9d7chd48vLK4ZjL=3ESGFKPRmvcSw=_e-AefNXzr2KX8_kRw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2014 14:36:59 +0900
From: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>
To: David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Cc: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/37] perf tools: Introduce thread__comm_time() helpers
On Sat, Dec 27, 2014 at 2:00 AM, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com> wrote:
> On 12/24/14 12:15 AM, Namhyung Kim wrote:
>>
>> @@ -139,6 +161,16 @@ const char *thread__comm_str(const struct thread
>> *thread)
>> return comm__str(comm);
>> }
>>
>> +const char *thread__comm_time_str(const struct thread *thread, u64
>> timestamp)
>> +{
>> + const struct comm *comm = thread__comm_time(thread, timestamp);
>> +
>> + if (!comm)
>> + return NULL;
>> +
>> + return comm__str(comm);
>> +}
>> +
>
>
> thread__comm_str_time()? time_str suggests a time-based string as opposed to
> a comm_str based on time.
Will change - my naming sense is always awful. I'd be happy to hear
any naming suggestion. ;-)
Thanks,
Namhyung
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists