[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAA5enKZgR7a4cyKsM7MWrkR=KwP40tigViYpEU7=_6ZyYvk6sw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 31 Dec 2014 21:28:06 +0000
From: Lorenzo Stoakes <lstoakes@...il.com>
To: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc: gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, Ana Rey <anarey@...il.com>,
mcgrof@...not-panic.com, tapaswenipathak@...il.com,
Rui Silva <rmfrfs@...il.com>, Jiayi Ye <yejiayily@...il.com>,
Greg Donald <gdonald@...il.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/4] staging: rtl8192u: fix whitespace
On 31 December 2014 at 21:20, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> It'd be nicer to use the same form and indentation
> for both entries.
>
> Probably be nicer to use:
>
> static u32 edca_setting_DL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] = {
> 0x5e4322, 0x5e4322, 0x5e4322, 0x604322, 0x00a44f, 0x5ea44f
> };
> static u32 edca_setting_UL[HT_IOT_PEER_MAX] = {
> 0x5e4322, 0x00a44f, 0x5e4322, 0x604322, 0x5ea44f, 0x5ea44f
> };
>
> so that the entries align too.
Ack... I am a bit of a beginner at the kernel, I think you can tell
;-) I didn't mean for this to have different indentation, in fixing up
other issues I missed this one, will fix. Will also add the 00 prefix,
good idea (+ update the commit message to accommodate.)
>
> Would it be better to use const?
>
I think this would be better as a separate patch as that is getting
into changing actual semantics rather than just simple style fixes,
there is a lot that could be improved here in that realm I think :)
Best, Lorenzo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists