[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <C2D7FE5348E1B147BCA15975FBA2307565BC9D66@IN01WEMBXA.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 13:52:33 +0000
From: Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To: Peter Hurley <peter@...leysoftware.com>,
Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"robh@...nel.org" <robh@...nel.org>,
"jslaby@...e.cz" <jslaby@...e.cz>, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/3] serial: 8250_early: prepare for dynamic BASE_BAUD
On Monday 05 January 2015 07:04 PM, Peter Hurley wrote:
>> Also what do u think of the early IER optimization ?
> Seems ok except the commit changelog is wrong: IER is disabled twice per _line_.
> How did you profile it? It's ok if the answer is "seemed faster"; I'm just
> curious.
Looking at the code yes this would be per line - but I vaguely remember seeing it
for every char - this was when debugging a systemC model for 8250. Its been a while...
I'd added prints in the model whenever IER would wiggle and it was just being
written with 0's again and again when in the early polling based printing mode.
I'll send a revised version with fixed changelog.
Thx,
-Vineet
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists