[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AA9C4D.3000001@freescale.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 16:14:37 +0200
From: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@...escale.com>
To: <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
CC: <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI?
Hello,
While doing some performance testing of a KVM guest on a PPC platform, I
noticed that there's a read of the CPU_WHOAMI register after each MPIC
EOI [1]. This has been present since the initial implementation of the
MPIC driver [2]. In a KVM virtualized environment, this results in an
additional kvm_exit.
Is the read back necessary? Is it used to provide some sort of
synchronization mechanism, making sure that nothing else is executed
until the EOI write is finished? I eliminated the mpic_cpu_read call and
run the kernel on hardware and noticed no anomaly, however I am not sure
of all the implications and race conditions it might lead to.
I was curious why the mpic_cpu_read(MPIC_INFO(CPU_WHOAMI)) was there in
the first place and if it's still needed. If it's still required, I
guess a better approach is to eliminate the call only if the kernel is
running on the KVM guest side, where the MPIC is emulated and no longer
requires a readback.
Thank you,
Bogdan P.
[1] http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/arch/powerpc/sysdev/mpic.c#L659
[2] https://lkml.org/lkml/2004/10/22/483
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists