[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150105174616.GA3159@rhlx01.hs-esslingen.de>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 18:46:16 +0100
From: Andreas Mohr <andi@...as.de>
To: Purcareata Bogdan <b43198@...escale.com>
Cc: benh@...nel.crashing.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC] PPC: MPIC: necessary readback after EOI?
Hi,
> I was curious why the mpic_cpu_read(MPIC_INFO(CPU_WHOAMI)) was there in
> the first place and if it's still needed. If it's still required, I
> guess a better approach is to eliminate the call only if the kernel is
> running on the KVM guest side, where the MPIC is emulated and no longer
> requires a readback.
"Why not?"
A mechanism being "emulated"/"virtual" or not
may not necessarily be much of a distinction (if at all!).
The readback might be required
to properly fulfill all requirements
of a full state change protocol specification,
which might easily be the case for both RS(*) and virtual hardware.
And especially for virtual hardware
such a "readback" event
might be an extremely important "end of transaction" marker
which may often be needed for freeing of temporary resources etc.
I'm talking out of my *ss without any MPIC specifics here
(and especially not why the readback there actually is needed -
if that doesn't happen to be the case for PCI Posting reasons or some such),
but it's just intended as food for thought :)
*) Real Silicon (rather than RL - Real Life)
HTH,
Andreas Mohr
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists