[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AB0844.5090405@users.sourceforge.net>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 22:55:16 +0100
From: SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>
CC: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/8] fs/9p: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the
function call "p9_client_clunk"
>> https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git/tree/net/9p/client.c?id=d8282ea05ad119247122de23db7d48ad6098cfa2#n1448
>> http://lxr.free-electrons.com/source/net/9p/client.c#L1448
>
> What do you mean by "work in principle"?
If I do not stumble on an unexpected name space issue from my static source
analysis again, then I would see the linked function as relevant here.
Its implementation provides a clear input parameter validation.
> But you don't want to do a dump_stack for no reason. That would at best
> be very misleading, and I would imagine be quite expensive.
The error response is clear. Are any software developments efforts expected
to clean-up the call stack for unwanted null pointers even more?
Regards,
Markus
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists