[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AB0C75.1090204@broadcom.com>
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2015 23:13:09 +0100
From: Arend van Spriel <arend@...adcom.com>
To: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
CC: Johannes Berg <johannes@...solutions.net>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Marcel Holtmann <marcel@...tmann.org>,
Stanislav Yakovlev <stas.yakovlev@...il.com>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
linux-wireless <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>,
Network Development <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Revert "ipw2200: select CFG80211_WEXT"
On 01/05/15 23:05, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Mon, 2015-01-05 at 19:57 +0100, Johannes Berg wrote:
>> Multiple other groups of ioctls could be converted in similar patches,
>> until at the end you can completely remove ipw_wx_handlers and rely
>> entirely on cfg80211's wext compatibility.
>>
>> So far the theory - in practice nobody cared enough to start working on
>> any of these drivers, let alone actually has the hardware today.
>
> So my suggestion to make ipw2200 no longer use cfg80211_wext_giwname()
> would actually be backwards. What's actually needed, in theory, is to
> use more of what's provided under CFG80211_WEXT (and, I guess, less of
> what's provided under WIRELESS_EXT). Did I get that right?
Yes, but as Johannes indicated it needs consideration what to group in
the patches.
Regards,
Arend
> Thanks,
>
>
> Paul Bolle
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists