[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1420496330.14308.37.camel@x220>
Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2015 23:18:50 +0100
From: Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
To: Konrad Zapalowicz <bergo.torino@...il.com>
Cc: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
pankaj.saraf@...tech.in, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
abbotti@....co.uk, jitendra kumar khasdev <jkhasdev@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] *** SUBJECT HERE ***
On Sun, 2015-01-04 at 02:41 +0100, Konrad Zapalowicz wrote:
> git send-email does one thing and one thing only - sends stuff via
> email. I do not see why it should parse the emails and decide whether to
> complete the operation or break based on what is in the emails.
It already has to parse the file(s) it's provided with. Perhaps it
already has checks to validate Subject: lines. Would an extra test be a
burden?
> It could
> warn though however since the cover letter is a product of different
> command introducing this logic would tightly couple those which is not
> good.
A warning would be too late: the message with the silly subject would be
already sent out.
> I guess that it is better that people who send stuff acctually care what
> they are sending. I mean that pretty quickly you learn to send the
> series of patches first to yourself and review before it goes out to the
> public.
It's good if people are careful. It's also good if programs help to
avoid silly mistakes.
Paul Bolle
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists