linux-kernel - Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH 1/8] fs/9p: Deletion of unnecessary checks before the function call "p9_client

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150106100434.GH15033@mwanda>
Date:	Tue, 6 Jan 2015 13:04:34 +0300
From:	Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:	Dominique Martinet <dominique.martinet@....fr>
Cc:	Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...6.fr>,
	SF Markus Elfring <elfring@...rs.sourceforge.net>,
	Latchesar Ionkov <lucho@...kov.net>,
	Eric Van Hensbergen <ericvh@...il.com>,
	kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Ron Minnich <rminnich@...dia.gov>,
	v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [V9fs-developer] [PATCH 1/8] fs/9p: Deletion of unnecessary
 checks before the function call "p9_client_clunk"

On Tue, Jan 06, 2015 at 10:27:19AM +0100, Dominique Martinet wrote:
> (All other patches in the set look good to me at second glance, now.
> To answer Dan's mail, none of these are bug fix as far as I've seen,
> just avoiding unnecessary checks for null or calls+check/warn depending
> on whether you apply patch #1 first)

You're right.  The patch set introduces bugs then fixes them later.

regards,
dan carpenter

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/