linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ovl: Prevent rw remount when it should be ro mount

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Thu, 08 Jan 2015 00:04:59 +0900
From:	Seunghun Lee <waydi1@...il.com>
To:	hujianyang <hujianyang@...wei.com>
CC:	miklos@...redi.hu, sedat.dilek@...il.com,
	richard.weinberger@...il.com, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-unionfs@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ovl: Prevent rw remount when it should be ro mount

Hi Hu,

On 01/07/2015 11:56 AM, hujianyang wrote:
> Hi,
>
> There maybe some misunderstandings here. I think your patch really
> fix an important problem, but not in correct way.
>
> On 2015/1/6 22:02, Seunghun Lee wrote:
>> After patch:
>> root@...ux86:~# mount -t overlay overlay -olowerdir=lower:lower2 merged
>> mount: warning: merged seems to be mounted read-only.
>> root@...ux86:~# mount | grep overlay
>> overlay on /home/root/merged type overlay (ro,relatime,lowerdir=lower:lower2)
>> root@...ux86:~# mount -o remount,rw merged
>> mount: warning: /home/root/merged seems to be mounted read-only.
>> root@...ux86:~# mount | grep overlay
>> overlay on /home/root/merged type overlay (ro,relatime,lowerdir=lower:lower2)
>> root@...ux86:~# echo hi > merged/hi
>> -sh: merged/hi: Read-only file system
>> root@...ux86:~#
>>
> If users want a rw mount, can we give them a ro mount? I think it's
> wrong, .remount_fs should refuse this request.
>
> So I think your .remount_fs should check both what users in userpace
> want and what kernel can offer, then realize legal requests and
> refuse illegal requests. Not changing the requests from users.
Many file systems just change flags when user requests read-write remount.
(romfs, squashfs, sysv...)
I thought this case is similar above filesystems.
> Further more, can we replace upper/lower/work directories or mount
> point by this .remount_fs?
>
> If you want to export a new function, I think you should considering
> more about these.
>
> Thanks,
> Hu
>
Yes, you are right. However, this patch is a minimal support to
prevent kernel panic when file system is remounted to read-write mode.
And many file systems have remount_fs function of this kind.

I think what you mentioned is can be added later if it is necessary.

Thanks.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/