[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdYOqbsTgNMx8n_NmAe2vtfx+mGRGpw3zUCqjsrFiH0ZVw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 20:25:02 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>,
Alexandru Stan <amstan@...omium.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] pinctrl: rockchip: Avoid losing interrupts when
supporting both edges
On Mon, Dec 22, 2014 at 7:47 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> I was seeing cases where I was losing interrupts when inserting and
> removing SD cards. Sometimes the card would get "stuck" in the
> inserted state.
>
> I believe that the problem was related to the code to handle the case
> where we needed both rising and falling edges. This code would
> disable the interrupt as the polarity was switched. If an interrupt
> came at the wrong time it could be lost.
>
> We'll match what the gpio-dwapb.c driver does upstream and change the
> interrupt polarity without disabling things.
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Patch applied for fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists