| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <54AF165F.7070909@ti.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jan 2015 18:44:31 -0500
From: Murali Karicheri <m-karicheri2@...com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@....linux.org.uk>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] of: move of_dma_configure() to device,c to help
re-use
On 01/08/2015 05:24 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 08 January 2015 14:26:36 Murali Karicheri wrote:
>> On 01/08/2015 03:40 AM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
>>> On Wednesday 07 January 2015 17:37:56 Rob Herring wrote:
>>>> On Wed, Jan 7, 2015 at 12:49 PM, Murali Karicheri<m-karicheri2@...com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> + ret = of_dma_get_range(np,&dma_addr,&paddr,&size);
>>>>> + if (ret< 0) {
>>>>> + dma_addr = offset = 0;
>>>>> + size = dev->coherent_dma_mask + 1;
>>>>
>>>> If coherent_dma_mask is DMA_BIT_MASK(64), then you will overflow and
>>>> have a size of 0. There may also be a problem when the mask is only
>>>> 32-bit type.
>>>
>>> The mask is always a 64-bit type, it's not optional. But you are right,
>>> the 64-bit mask case is broken, so I guess we have to fix it differently
>>> by always passing the smaller value into arch_setup_dma_ops and
>>> adapting that function instead.
>> Arnd,
>>
>> What is the smaller value you are referring to in the below code?
>> between *dev->dma_mask and size from DT? But overflow can still happen
>> when size is to be calculated in arch_setup_dma_ops() for Non DT case or
>> when DT size is configured to be equivalent of DMA_BIT_MASK(64) + 1. Can
>> we discuss the code change you have in mind when you get a chance?
>
> I meant changing every function that the size values gets passed into
> to take a mask like 0xffffffff instead of a size like 0x100000000, so
> we can represent a 64-bit capable bus correctly.
The function here refers to arch_setup_dma_ops() and anything that is
called by this API, right?
>
> This means we also need to adapt the value returned from of_dma_get_range.
> A minor complication here is that the DT properties sometimes already
> contain the mask value, in particular when we want to represent a
> full mapping like
>
The grep of dma-ranges for arch/arm shows the size used is mask + 1 as
./boot/dts/keystone.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0x8 0x00000000
0x80000000>;
./boot/dts/keystone.dtsi: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/keystone.dtsi: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/r8a7790.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0 0x40000000 0
0x40000000 0 0x80000000
./boot/dts/integratorap.dts: dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0x0 0x80000000>;
./boot/dts/r8a7791.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0 0x40000000 0
0x40000000 0 0x80000000
./boot/dts/.k2hk-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0x8
0x00000000 0x80000000>;
./boot/dts/.k2hk-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/.k2l-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0x8
0x00000000 0x80000000>;
./boot/dts/.k2l-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/.k2e-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges = <0x80000000 0x8
0x00000000 0x80000000>;
./boot/dts/.k2e-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/.k2e-evm.dtb.dts.tmp: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/k2e.dtsi: dma-ranges;
./boot/dts/k2e.dtsi: dma-ranges;
So for ARM 32 the below case doesn't seem to apply.
> bus {
> #address-cells =<1>;
> #size-cells =<1>;
> dma-ranges =<0 0 0xffffffff>; /* all 4 GB, DMA_BIT_MASK(32) */
> };
>
> as opposed to
>
A search under arch/arm64 and arch/powerpc showed another format for
dma-ranges for PCI. Now I am bit nervous on how of_pci_dma_configure()
behave for these platforms as PCI nodes on these platforms may have
dma-ranges in a different format than that in platform bus nodes. These
DT property has additional cell for resource identification (example
0x42000000 as the first cell). Also one of them, amd-seattle-soc.dtsi
uses the format of size (0x7fffffffff) similar to what you refered above.
./boot/dts/apm/apm-storm.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x80
0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x00 0x80000000
./boot/dts/apm/apm-storm.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x80
0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x00 0x80000000
./boot/dts/apm/apm-storm.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x80
0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x00 0x80000000
./boot/dts/apm/apm-storm.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x80
0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x00 0x80000000
./boot/dts/apm/apm-storm.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x42000000 0x80
0x00000000 0x80 0x00000000 0x00 0x80000000
./boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x80 0x0 0x80 0x0
0x7f 0xffffffff>;
./boot/dts/amd/amd-seattle-soc.dtsi: dma-ranges = <0x43000000 0x80 0x0
0x80 0x0 0x7f 0xffffffff>;
Or I got this wrong. Any comment?
For ARM 32, DT size value can be extracted and size-1 can be passed to
arch_setup_dma_ops() provided it handles this value properly.
> bus {
> #address-cells =<1>;
> #size-cells =<1>;
> dma-ranges =<0 0 0x80000000>; /* only lower 2GB, DMA_BIT_MASK(31) */
> };
>
> or
>
> bus {
> #address-cells =<2>;
> #size-cells =<2>;
> dma-ranges =<0 0 0x0000000100000000>; /* 4GB of 64-bit address space */
> };
>
>
> Arnd
--
Murali Karicheri
Linux Kernel, Texas Instruments
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists