[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE1zotKu0f+169_WO3O=+Q1hpU_r-x60FLpJRWyd-na7B9T_VA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 12:40:28 +1300
From: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
To: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work
On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
>
>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers
>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies
>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ
>> drivers.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
>
> Patch applied for fixes.
>
Hi Linus,
I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the
-for-next branch?
Thanks,
Tavi
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists