[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACRpkdY-pW98cymyAKpV4s8x00e-7MPksMX1_0Tj+1QT3WskMw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 07:58:48 +0100
From: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
To: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
Cc: Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work
On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Octavian Purdila
<octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
>> <octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers
>>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies
>>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ
>>> drivers.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
>>
>> Patch applied for fixes.
>>
>
> Hi Linus,
>
> I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the
> -for-next branch?
Ah sorry I thought only the first patch was a critical fix.
Applied this to fixes too now. Working on queueing the
GPIO fixes.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists