linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAE1zot+FF-6TVJKaqmQ0Shouhtvo0eWytxGJG1VgqWFAen5JZg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:57:59 +1300
From:	Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
To:	Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Cc:	Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>, Johan Hovold <johan@...nel.org>,
	"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] gpio: dln2: use bus_sync_unlock instead of scheduling work

On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2015 at 12:40 AM, Octavian Purdila
> <octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 1, 2015 at 9:56 AM, Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 2:02 PM, Octavian Purdila
>>> <octavian.purdila@...el.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Use the irq_chip bus_sync_unlock method to update hardware registers
>>>> instead of scheduling work from the mask/unmask methods. This simplifies
>>>> a bit the driver and make it more uniform with the other GPIO IRQ
>>>> drivers.
>>>>
>>>> Signed-off-by: Octavian Purdila <octavian.purdila@...el.com>
>>>
>>> Patch applied for fixes.
>>>
>>
>> Hi Linus,
>>
>> I don't see the patch applied, could you please consider it for the
>> -for-next branch?
>
> Ah sorry I thought only the first patch was a critical fix.
> Applied this to fixes too now. Working on queueing the
> GPIO fixes.

Hi Linus,

Its not a critical fix, its just a clean-up. I thought it would go in
the the for-next branch (for 3.20) and since I did not see it there I
thought it got lost.

Sorry for any confusion I may have caused, I am not familiar with the
GPIO branch work-flow.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/