[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AFEF78.8050603@citrix.com>
Date: Fri, 9 Jan 2015 15:10:48 +0000
From: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>
To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@...e.com>,
David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
Juergen Gross <JGross@...e.com>
CC: xen-devel <xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org>,
<boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 3/3] xen: use correct type for physical addresses
On 09/01/15 12:56, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>> On 09.01.15 at 13:51, <david.vrabel@...rix.com> wrote:
>> On 09/01/15 09:57, Jan Beulich wrote:
>>>>>> On 08.01.15 at 18:01, <JGross@...e.com> wrote:
>>>> @@ -284,7 +286,7 @@ static void __init xen_update_mem_tables(unsigned long pfn, unsigned long mfn)
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> /* Update kernel mapping, but not for highmem. */
>>>> - if ((pfn << PAGE_SHIFT) >= __pa(high_memory))
>>>> + if (PFN_PHYS(pfn) >= (u64)(__pa(high_memory)))
>>>
>>> I don't think you really need the cast on the right side - __pa()
>>> should be returning a value of suitable type (and unsigned long
>>> would be sufficient for anything up to and including high_memory).
>>
>> I'd prefer:
>>
>> if (pfn >= PFN_DOWN(__pa(high_memory))
>
> Even better indeed. Just one more point: Strictly speaking
> __pa(high_memory) is invalid, as __pa() is defined for low
> memory only. Hence perhaps PFN_UP(__pa(high_memory - 1))?
Yes.
David
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists