[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <54AFF0F4.1030608@suse.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jan 2015 16:17:08 +0100
From: Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>
To: David Vrabel <david.vrabel@...rix.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] xen: correct race in alloc_p2m_pmd()
On 01/09/2015 04:09 PM, David Vrabel wrote:
> On 08/01/15 17:01, Juergen Gross wrote:
>> When allocating a new pmd for the linear mapped p2m list a check is
>> done for not introducing another pmd when this just happened on
>> another cpu. In this case the old pte pointer was returned which
>> points to the p2m_missing or p2m_identity page. The correct value
>> would be the pointer to the found new page.
>
> Looking at the check I don't see how it works at all.
>
> alloc_p2m() looks up the address of the PTE page
>
> ptep = lookup_address(addr, &level);
> pte_pg = (pte_t *)((unsigned long)ptep & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1));
>
> But the check under the lock that is still true does:
>
> ptechk = lookup_address(vaddr, &level);
> if (ptechk == pte_pg) {
>
> So I don't see how this works unless (by chance) we happen to get the
> first entry in the PTE page.
The check under lock tests vaddr which is pmd aligned.
> It also doesn't handle racing with p2m_missing_pte to p2m_identity_pte
> (or vice-versa) change.
The change is always and only for missing/identity to individual pmd.
There is no transition between all missing and identity pmds.
> Something like:
>
> ptechk = lookup_address(vaddr, &level);
> ptechk = (pte_t *)((unsigned long)ptechk & ~(PAGE_SIZE - 1));
> if (ptechk == p2m_missing_pte || ptechk == p2m_identity) {
> set_pmd(..)
>
> Perhaps?
Would work, but is more complicated than needed. :-)
Juergen
>
> David
>
>> --- a/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/p2m.c
>> @@ -440,10 +440,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(get_phys_to_machine);
>> * a new pmd is to replace p2m_missing_pte or p2m_identity_pte by a individual
>> * pmd. In case of PAE/x86-32 there are multiple pmds to allocate!
>> */
>> -static pte_t *alloc_p2m_pmd(unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t *pte_pg)
>> +static pte_t *alloc_p2m_pmd(unsigned long addr, pte_t *pte_pg)
>> {
>> pte_t *ptechk;
>> - pte_t *pteret = ptep;
>> pte_t *pte_newpg[PMDS_PER_MID_PAGE];
>> pmd_t *pmdp;
>> unsigned int level;
>> @@ -477,8 +476,6 @@ static pte_t *alloc_p2m_pmd(unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t *pte_pg)
>> if (ptechk == pte_pg) {
>> set_pmd(pmdp,
>> __pmd(__pa(pte_newpg[i]) | _KERNPG_TABLE));
>> - if (vaddr == (addr & ~(PMD_SIZE - 1)))
>> - pteret = pte_offset_kernel(pmdp, addr);
>> pte_newpg[i] = NULL;
>> }
>>
>> @@ -492,7 +489,7 @@ static pte_t *alloc_p2m_pmd(unsigned long addr, pte_t *ptep, pte_t *pte_pg)
>> vaddr += PMD_SIZE;
>> }
>>
>> - return pteret;
>> + return lookup_address(addr, &level);
>> }
>>
>> /*
>> @@ -521,7 +518,7 @@ static bool alloc_p2m(unsigned long pfn)
>>
>> if (pte_pg == p2m_missing_pte || pte_pg == p2m_identity_pte) {
>> /* PMD level is missing, allocate a new one */
>> - ptep = alloc_p2m_pmd(addr, ptep, pte_pg);
>> + ptep = alloc_p2m_pmd(addr, pte_pg);
>> if (!ptep)
>> return false;
>> }
>>
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists