linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: Convert direct LOGERR uses to pr

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150111052428.GC24038@kroah.com>
Date:	Sat, 10 Jan 2015 21:24:28 -0800
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
Cc:	Benjamin Romer <benjamin.romer@...sys.com>,
	David Kershner <david.kershner@...sys.com>,
	devel@...verdev.osuosl.org, sparmaintainer@...sys.com,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] staging: unisys: Convert direct LOGERR uses to pr_err

On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 08:55:21PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2015-01-10 at 20:13 -0800, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 10, 2015 at 07:09:02PM -0800, Joe Perches wrote:
> > > Use the normal logging facility instead of a new macro.
> > > 
> > > Miscellanea:
> > > 
> > > o Realign arguments
> > > o Remove unnecessary alloc error messages as alloc failures
> > >   already emits a generic OOM message with a dump_stack
> > > o Add missing newlines to these messages to avoid interleaving
> > > o Spelling/typo fixes in those messages
> []
> > I rejected the other patch that did much this same thing, almost all of
> > these should be converted to use dev_* calls instead of pr_* calls, as
> > this is a driver, and drivers should always have access to a struct
> > device.  If not, they need to be fixed.
> 
> Baby steps.
> 
> This one prevents interleaving
> and fixes typos.

Yes, but converting it to dev_* at the same time saves a step, and gets
it done properly.  Leaving messages at pr_* levels takes away the
checkpatch warning, which makes the code "seem" to be acceptable.

sorry,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/