[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <A2CA0424C0A6F04399FB9E1CD98E030484506E69@US01WEMBX2.internal.synopsys.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:35:52 +0000
From: Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>
To: Robert Baldyga <r.baldyga@...sung.com>,
"dinh.linux@...il.com" <dinh.linux@...il.com>
CC: "balbi@...com" <balbi@...com>,
"gregkh@...uxfoundation.org" <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
"linux-usb@...r.kernel.org" <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: dwc2: problems with IN requests completion in linux-next
> From: Robert Baldyga [mailto:r.baldyga@...sung.com]
> Sent: Monday, December 22, 2014 6:13 AM
>
> I have recently noticed problem with DWC2 driver in latest linux-next. I
> use it in gadget only mode at Samsung platform (Odroid U3) but I believe
> the bug can be reproduced at another platforms.
>
> While running FFS example (tools/usb/ffs-aio-example/simple/) the
> communication breaks after few seconds. It's because one of IN requests
> enqueued in DWC2 driver do not complete. At USB analyzer I see that USB
> device started to transmit data from this request, but it ended incomplete.
>
> I bisected kernel tree, and I got following patches are reason of break.
>
> 941fcce usb: dwc2: Update the gadget driver to use common dwc2_hsotg
> structure
> 117777b usb: dwc2: Move gadget probe function into platform code
> bcc0607 usb: dwc2: convert to use dev_pm_ops API
> 510ffaa usb: dwc2: Initialize the USB core for peripheral mode
> db8178c usb: dwc2: Update common interrupt handler to call gadget
> interrupt handler
> 8d736d8 usb: dwc2: gadget: Do not fail probe if there isn't a clock node
>
> Patch 941fcce breaks DWC2 driver at my platform and it starts to work
> from 8d736d8 but it has described bug.
>
> I will try to localize reason of this issue.
Hi Robert,
I think the most likely suspect would be db8178c, since the rest appear
to be init-time things. It seems to revert cleanly, can you try
reverting just that patch and see if it helps?
--
Paul
Powered by blists - more mailing lists