lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <877fwsxpci.fsf@intel.com>
Date:	Mon, 12 Jan 2015 12:31:09 +0200
From:	Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com>
Cc:	Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@...el.com>,
	David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
	intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] drm/i915: fix inconsistent brightness after resume

On Sat, 10 Jan 2015, Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com> wrote:
> Commit 6dda730e55f4 introduced a bug which resulted in inconsistent
> brightness levels on different machines. If a suspended was entered
> with the screen off some machines would resume with the screen
> at minimum brightness and others at maximum brightness.
>
> The following commands can be used to produce this behavior.
>
>   xset dpms force off
>   sleep 1
>   sudo systemctl suspend
>   (resume ...)
>
> The root cause of this problem is a comparison which checks to see if
> the backlight level is zero when the panel is enabled.  If it is zero,
> it is set to the maximum level.  Unfortunately, not all machines have a
> minimum level of zero. On those machines the level is left at the
> minimum instead of begin set to the maximum.

Good catch!

I think part of the problem is that the userspace sets brightness to
minimum before suspend, but apparently does not restore it after
resume. The dmesg would confirm this. But I guess it doesn't matter,
since we're pretty much stuck with having to do this anyway.

> Fix the bug by updating the comparison to check for the minimum
> backlight level instead of zero.
>
> Fixes: 6dda730e55f4 ("respect the VBT minimum backlight brightness")
> Signed-off-by: Jeremiah Mahler <jmmahler@...il.com>
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c | 2 +-
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> index 4d63839..4ef4d66 100644
> --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_panel.c
> @@ -962,7 +962,7 @@ void intel_panel_enable_backlight(struct intel_connector *connector)
>  
>  	WARN_ON(panel->backlight.max == 0);
>  
> -	if (panel->backlight.level == 0) {
> +	if (panel->backlight.level == panel->backlight.min) {

Perhaps <= instead of == would be safest?


BR,
Jani.

>  		panel->backlight.level = panel->backlight.max;
>  		if (panel->backlight.device)
>  			panel->backlight.device->props.brightness =
> -- 
> 2.1.4
>

-- 
Jani Nikula, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ