[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK1hOcMj6S+fzECOOp7jS47fRecjXXLkaQ=yQMHHwvfX7vhY6Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 07:23:44 +0100
From: Denys Vlasenko <vda.linux@...glemail.com>
To: Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>
Cc: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce push/pop macros which generate
CFI_REL_OFFSET and CFI_RESTORE
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 1:38 AM, Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net> wrote:
>> Sequences
>> pushl_cfi %reg
>> CFI_REL_OFFSET reg, 0
>> and
>> popl_cfi %reg
>> CFI_RESTORE reg
>> happen quite often. This patch adds macros which generate them.
>>
>> No assembly changes (verified with objdump -dr vmlinux.o).
>
> Looks sane to me. Where does this apply in relation to the rest of your series?
On top of my latest four-patch set.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists