[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150112192314.GF3904@pd.tnic>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 20:23:14 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Denys Vlasenko <dvlasenk@...hat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...capital.net>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
X86 ML <x86@...nel.org>, Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...mgrid.com>,
Will Drewry <wad@...omium.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86: introduce push/pop macros which generate
CFI_REL_OFFSET and CFI_RESTORE
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:07:35AM +0100, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> Sequences
> pushl_cfi %reg
> CFI_REL_OFFSET reg, 0
> and
> popl_cfi %reg
> CFI_RESTORE reg
> happen quite often. This patch adds macros which generate them.
>
> No assembly changes (verified with objdump -dr vmlinux.o).
...
> diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> index f6f1598..de1cdaf 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/dwarf2.h
> @@ -86,11 +86,23 @@
> CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
> .endm
>
> + .macro pushq_cfi_reg reg
> + pushq %\reg
> + CFI_ADJUST_CFA_OFFSET 8
> + CFI_REL_OFFSET \reg, 0
> + .endm
What's wrong with adding the CFI_REL_OFFSET to the pushl/popl_cfi macro
and not add two new _reg macros?
I.e., have the _cfi macros add all the CFI annotations needed.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists