[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLW7xymopptsq5zWMyY_P25WmNvKne4u_LH-kZKK25N5fQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:22:11 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 00/10][RFC] Increased clocksource validation and cleanups
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:41 AM, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:34:18PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>> So this series is the result of earlier discussions with Linus
>> and his suggestions around improvements to clocksource validation
>> in the hope we can more easily catch bad hardware.
>
> Why penalize most users just because of a random hardware failure?
> Why not make the "catching code" a compile time option?
Yea, I've not looked at the actual performance impact yet, but things
like the read-time capping (which is in the hot path) could be put
under a debug config. Thanks for the suggestion!
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists