[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CALAqxLWnAQhVzJH4VzVN9oyYAPu88R1jX3CvDatrra8XKC1djw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 10:36:58 -0800
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Richard Cochran <richardcochran@...il.com>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 03/10] clocksource: Remove clocksource_max_deferment()
On Sun, Jan 11, 2015 at 3:47 AM, Richard Cochran
<richardcochran@...il.com> wrote:
>
> This series added:
>
> + /* Return 50% of the actual maximum, so we can detect bad values */
> + max_nsecs >>= 1;
>
> and then...
>
> On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 04:34:21PM -0800, John Stultz wrote:
>> @@ -760,7 +746,8 @@ void __clocksource_updatefreq_scale(struct clocksource *cs, u32 scale, u32 freq)
>> cs->maxadj = clocksource_max_adjustment(cs);
>> }
>>
>> - cs->max_idle_ns = clocksource_max_deferment(cs);
>> + cs->max_idle_ns = clocks_calc_max_nsecs(cs->mult, cs->shift,
>> + cs->maxadj, cs->mask);
>> }
>> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(__clocksource_updatefreq_scale);
>>
>> @@ -807,7 +794,8 @@ int clocksource_register(struct clocksource *cs)
>> cs->name);
>>
>> /* calculate max idle time permitted for this clocksource */
>> - cs->max_idle_ns = clocksource_max_deferment(cs);
>> + cs->max_idle_ns = clocks_calc_max_nsecs(cs->mult, cs->shift,
>> + cs->maxadj, cs->mask);
>
> ... the whole world's maximum idle time is artificially reduced by
> half in order to catch some rare HW bug? Not a very green solution.
So, the first patch had a cleanup which removed case where the max
mult value was being calculated assuming nanoseconds was a s64 instead
of a u64, which resulted in the max_idle_ns to be halved. So this
doesn't actually cost us more over what the current kernel does.
In fact, the cleanup removed the extra 12.5% reductions that were
applied, so for the HPET in qemu on my system, the max idle goes from
~16 secs to ~21 secs with this patchset (if I'm remembering
correctly).
But I'm open to put this under a debug config if its justified (part
of Linus' concern w/ clocksource code is that its had a few spots that
were needlessly complex, so some weighing of performance/power vs
simplified logic should be done). Do you have a specific case in mind
that you're worried about?
thanks
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists