[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113075557.GH2110@esperanza>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:55:57 +0300
From: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
To: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>
CC: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 2/2] mm: vmscan: init reclaim_state in
do_try_to_free_pages
On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 05:26:34PM -0500, Johannes Weiner wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 12, 2015 at 12:30:38PM +0300, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> > All users of do_try_to_free_pages() want to have current->reclaim_state
> > set in order to account reclaimed slab pages. So instead of duplicating
> > the reclaim_state initialization code in each call site, let's do it
> > directly in do_try_to_free_pages().
>
> Couldn't this be contained in shrink_slab() directly?
I had considered this possibility, but finally rejected it, because
- some slab pages can be reclaimed from shrink_lruvec (e.g.
buffer_head's); there shouldn't be too many of them though
- struct reclaim_state looks to me as a generic placeholder for lots of
reclaim-related stuff, though currently it is only used for counting
reclaimed slab pages, so IMO it should be initialized before starting
reclaim
Both arguments are not rock-solid as you can see, so if you think we can
neglect them, I'll do.
Thanks,
Vladimir
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists