[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150115131732.GF7000@dhcp22.suse.cz>
Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2015 14:17:32 +0100
From: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>
To: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -mm 1/2] mm: vmscan: account slab pages on memcg reclaim
On Mon 12-01-15 12:30:37, Vladimir Davydov wrote:
> Since try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages() can now call slab shrinkers, we
> should initialize reclaim_state and account reclaimed slab pages in
> scan_control->nr_reclaimed.
I am sorry, I didn't get to this one yet. As pointed out in othere email
(http://marc.info/?l=linux-mm&m=142132670609578&w=2) reclaim_state might
catch unrelated pages freed from slab. I do not like expanding its usage
for memcg.
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Davydov <vdavydov@...allels.com>
> ---
> mm/vmscan.c | 33 ++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> 1 file changed, 22 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/mm/vmscan.c b/mm/vmscan.c
> index 16f3e45742d6..b2c041139a51 100644
> --- a/mm/vmscan.c
> +++ b/mm/vmscan.c
> @@ -367,13 +367,16 @@ static unsigned long do_shrink_slab(struct shrink_control *shrinkctl,
> * the ->seeks setting of the shrink function, which indicates the
> * cost to recreate an object relative to that of an LRU page.
> *
> - * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects.
> + * Returns the number of reclaimed slab objects. The number of reclaimed
> + * pages is added to *@..._nr_reclaimed.
> */
> static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> unsigned long nr_scanned,
> - unsigned long nr_eligible)
> + unsigned long nr_eligible,
> + unsigned long *ret_nr_reclaimed)
> {
> + struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
> struct shrinker *shrinker;
> unsigned long freed = 0;
>
> @@ -412,6 +415,10 @@ static unsigned long shrink_slab(gfp_t gfp_mask, int nid,
>
> up_read(&shrinker_rwsem);
> out:
> + if (reclaim_state) {
> + *ret_nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> + reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> + }
> cond_resched();
> return freed;
> }
> @@ -419,6 +426,7 @@ out:
> void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> {
> unsigned long freed;
> + unsigned long nr_reclaimed = 0;
>
> do {
> struct mem_cgroup *memcg = NULL;
> @@ -426,7 +434,7 @@ void drop_slab_node(int nid)
> freed = 0;
> do {
> freed += shrink_slab(GFP_KERNEL, nid, memcg,
> - 1000, 1000);
> + 1000, 1000, &nr_reclaimed);
> } while ((memcg = mem_cgroup_iter(NULL, memcg, NULL)) != NULL);
> } while (freed > 10);
> }
> @@ -2339,7 +2347,6 @@ static inline bool should_continue_reclaim(struct zone *zone,
> static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> bool is_classzone)
> {
> - struct reclaim_state *reclaim_state = current->reclaim_state;
> unsigned long nr_reclaimed, nr_scanned;
> bool reclaimable = false;
>
> @@ -2371,7 +2378,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> if (memcg && is_classzone)
> shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone),
> memcg, sc->nr_scanned - scanned,
> - lru_pages);
> + lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
>
> /*
> * Direct reclaim and kswapd have to scan all memory
> @@ -2398,12 +2405,7 @@ static bool shrink_zone(struct zone *zone, struct scan_control *sc,
> if (global_reclaim(sc) && is_classzone)
> shrink_slab(sc->gfp_mask, zone_to_nid(zone), NULL,
> sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> - zone_lru_pages);
> -
> - if (reclaim_state) {
> - sc->nr_reclaimed += reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab;
> - reclaim_state->reclaimed_slab = 0;
> - }
> + zone_lru_pages, &sc->nr_reclaimed);
>
> vmpressure(sc->gfp_mask, sc->target_mem_cgroup,
> sc->nr_scanned - nr_scanned,
> @@ -2865,6 +2867,9 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
> .may_unmap = 1,
> .may_swap = may_swap,
> };
> + struct reclaim_state reclaim_state = {
> + .reclaimed_slab = 0,
> + };
>
> /*
> * Unlike direct reclaim via alloc_pages(), memcg's reclaim doesn't
> @@ -2875,6 +2880,9 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> zonelist = NODE_DATA(nid)->node_zonelists;
>
> + lockdep_set_current_reclaim_state(gfp_mask);
> + current->reclaim_state = &reclaim_state;
> +
> trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_begin(0,
> sc.may_writepage,
> sc.gfp_mask);
> @@ -2883,6 +2891,9 @@ unsigned long try_to_free_mem_cgroup_pages(struct mem_cgroup *memcg,
>
> trace_mm_vmscan_memcg_reclaim_end(nr_reclaimed);
>
> + current->reclaim_state = NULL;
> + lockdep_clear_current_reclaim_state();
> +
> return nr_reclaimed;
> }
> #endif
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
--
Michal Hocko
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists