[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113094833.GB1059@katana>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:48:33 +0100
From: Wolfram Sang <wsa@...-dreams.de>
To: "David E. Box" <david.e.box@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: Jarkko Nikula <jarkko.nikula@...ux.intel.com>, jdelvare@...e.de,
arnd@...db.de, maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com,
dianders@...omium.org, u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de,
laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com,
boris.brezillon@...e-electrons.com, andrew@...n.ch,
sjg@...omium.org, markus.mayer@...aro.org,
jacob.jun.pan@...ux.intel.com, max.schwarz@...ine.de,
mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com, skuribay@...ox.com,
Romain.Baeriswyl@...lis.com, wenkai.du@...el.com,
chiau.ee.chew@...el.com, alan@...ux.intel.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3 1/2] i2c-designware: Add i2c bus locking support
Hi Dave,
> Timely reply. Around i2c_dw_init(), yes. I just discovered this as the source
> of a recent hang that's occuring in the loop in __i2c_dw_enable().
> The hange occurs very infrequently and only, so far, when not built in. A
> block around i2c_dw_disable_int() would make sense as well as a precaution.
Any news on this or on a V4 of this series?
Thanks,
Wolfram
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (820 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists