linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH net-next] rhashtable: Lower/upper bucket may map to same lock while shrinking

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20150113155605.GN20387@casper.infradead.org>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:56:05 +0000
From:	'Thomas Graf' <tgraf@...g.ch>
To:	David Laight <David.Laight@...LAB.COM>
Cc:	"davem@...emloft.net" <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@...el.com>, LKP <lkp@...org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org" <netfilter-devel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"coreteam@...filter.org" <coreteam@...filter.org>,
	"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next] rhashtable: Lower/upper bucket may map to same
 lock while shrinking

On 01/13/15 at 03:06pm, David Laight wrote:
> OK, ht->mutes saves the day.
> Might be worth a comment to save people looking at the code in isolation
> from worrying and doing a bit search.
> OTOH it might be obvious from a slightly larger fragment than the diff.

Good idea. Will do this. Also, thanks for the suggestion in the other
email. I now understand what you meant.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/