linux-kernel - Re: your recent tools/include/ adjustments

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <54B54E3C0200007800054741@mail.emea.novell.com>
Date:	Tue, 13 Jan 2015 15:56:28 +0000
From:	"Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@...e.com>
To:	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...hat.com>
Cc:	"Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo" <acme@...nel.org>,
	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: your recent tools/include/ adjustments

>>> On 13.01.15 at 14:29, <acme@...hat.com> wrote:
> Em Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 08:48:35AM +0000, Jan Beulich escreveu:
>> Arnaldo,
>> 
>> considering that tools/include/ gets used by other than just perf, in
>> particular arch/x86/vdso/vdso2c.c, would you mind clarifying how
>> "tools: Move bitops.h from tools/perf/util to tools/" adding an
>> inclusion of asm/hweight.h to linux/bitops.h is supposed to work,
>> when the only potentially relevant header to be found is
>> tools/perf/util/include/asm/hweight.h?
> 
> Oops, includes are tricky, even more so when trying to reuse the kernel
> ones in tools/, so we need to go on addressing these problems, thanks
> for reporting.
> 
> Please take a look if the patch at the end addresses this problem, I
> think it should at least disentangle what is in tools/include from what
> is in tools/perf/.

It looks like it would fix the issue - thanks for the quick response.

Jan

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/