[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113052312.GA3497@sudip-PC>
Date: Tue, 13 Jan 2015 10:53:12 +0530
From: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
To: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@...adise.net.nz>
Cc: forest@...ttletooquiet.net, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
tvboxspy@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or
return
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:51:36AM +1100, Emrys Bayliss wrote:
> This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
> rxtx.c:588: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
was the checkpatch error solved with this change? have you checked?
and the checkpatch is giving error at line 558 and not at 588.
>
> Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@...adise.net.nz>
> ---
> drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 2 --
> 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> index ea5140a..0cce140 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> @@ -574,8 +574,6 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
>
> return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
> }
> -
> - return 0;
any reason why this return was removed ?
sudip
> }
>
> static u16 vnt_rxtx_rts(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
> --
> 2.2.1
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists