[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20150113055817.GA10754@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2015 21:58:17 -0800
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: Sudip Mukherjee <sudipm.mukherjee@...il.com>
Cc: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@...adise.net.nz>, forest@...ttletooquiet.net,
tvboxspy@...il.com, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] Staging: vt6656: Checkpatch fix: else after break or
return
On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 10:53:12AM +0530, Sudip Mukherjee wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 03:51:36AM +1100, Emrys Bayliss wrote:
> > This patch fixes the following checkpatch.pl error:
> > rxtx.c:588: WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
>
> was the checkpatch error solved with this change? have you checked?
>
> and the checkpatch is giving error at line 558 and not at 588.
>
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Emrys Bayliss <emrys@...adise.net.nz>
> > ---
> > drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c | 2 --
> > 1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> > index ea5140a..0cce140 100644
> > --- a/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> > +++ b/drivers/staging/vt6656/rxtx.c
> > @@ -574,8 +574,6 @@ static u16 vnt_fill_cts_head(struct vnt_usb_send_context *tx_context,
> >
> > return vnt_rxtx_datahead_g(tx_context, &buf->data_head);
> > }
> > -
> > - return 0;
>
> any reason why this return was removed ?
Because it's not needed.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists