linux-kernel - [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1421225658-3978-1-git-send-email-laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
Date:	Wed, 14 Jan 2015 16:54:14 +0800
From:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>
To:	<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
CC:	Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...fujitsu.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
	Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>,
	"Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
	tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>,
	Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2 shit_A shit_B] workqueue: fix wq_numa bug

Hi, All

This patches are un-changloged, un-compiled, un-booted, un-tested,
they are just shits, I even hope them un-sent or blocked.

The patches include two -solutions-:

Shit_A:
  workqueue: reset pool->node and unhash the pool when the node is
    offline
  update wq_numa when cpu_present_mask changed

 kernel/workqueue.c | 107 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
 1 file changed, 84 insertions(+), 23 deletions(-)

Shit_B:
  workqueue: reset pool->node and unhash the pool when the node is
    offline
  workqueue: remove wq_numa_possible_cpumask
  workqueue: directly update attrs of pools when cpu hot[un]plug

 kernel/workqueue.c | 135 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 101 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)

Both patch1 of the both solutions are: reset pool->node and unhash the pool,
it is suggested by TJ, I found it is a good leading-step for fixing the bug.

The other patches are handling wq_numa_possible_cpumask where the solutions
diverge.

Solution_A uses present_mask rather than possible_cpumask. It adds
wq_numa_notify_cpu_present_set/cleared() for notifications of
the changes of cpu_present_mask.  But the notifications are un-existed
right now, so I fake one (wq_numa_check_present_cpumask_changes())
to imitate them.  I hope the memory people add a real one.

Solution_B uses online_mask rather than possible_cpumask.
this solution remove more coupling between numa_code and workqueue,
it just depends on cpumask_of_node(node).

Patch2_of_Solution_B removes the wq_numa_possible_cpumask and add
overhead when cpu hot[un]plug, Patch3 reduce this overhead.

Thanks,
Lai

Reported-by: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
Cc: Yasuaki Ishimatsu <isimatu.yasuaki@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: "Gu, Zheng" <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: tangchen <tangchen@...fujitsu.com>
Cc: Hiroyuki KAMEZAWA <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>
-- 
2.1.0

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/